Posted by
Michael Gaijer on Sunday, June 29, 2008 8:41:48 PM
I was really hoping to be first on this subject, but unfortunately my server decided not to work during a passing thunderstorm, was the wiser thing to do. But I will perserver and go on with it.
Yesterday, June 26th, 2008, is a day worth noting on the calender of every good American, Republican or Democrat, who thinks his rights to defend his family and home where violated by the DC law.
As many of you know, the DC law forbade homeowners and gun owners in general, from protecting their properties or lives. By makeing it manditory to either, A: Purchase a trigger lock for the weapon and use it. Which makes it difficult to protect yourself with, or B: Keep the weapon dismantled and , `AND,' sealed in a box or tin or locker. Now that really makes it impossible to defend yourself.
So who do you suppose passed into law, this perticular one 32 years ago? Well in 1979, Jimmey Carter was POTUS, Democrats controlled Congress, Washington DC was 40% Black and the Drug trade was running amuck.
|
Year
|
Population
|
Index
|
Violent
|
Property
|
Murder
|
Forciable
Rape
|
Robbery
|
Aggrevated
assault
|
Burglary
|
Larceny
Theft
|
Vehicle
Theft
|
|
1979
|
656,000
|
56,430
|
10,553
|
45,877
|
180
|
489
|
6,920
|
2,964
|
13,452
|
28,819
|
3,606
|
Well, it seems in 1979, that they were not killing themselves, only 0.02%. But 29.32% of their homes where being victimized, 1.61% where being beaten and robbed, but of those violent crimes 65.57% where robberies. 0.14% of the women were being raped.
Today we see, well for 2006:
|
Year
|
Population
|
Index
|
Violent
|
Property
|
Murder
|
Forciable
Rape
|
Robbery
|
Aggrevated
assault
|
Burglary
|
Larceny
Theft
|
Vehicle
Theft
|
|
2006
|
581,530
|
34,165
|
8,772
|
27,063
|
169
|
185
|
3,829
|
4,589
|
3,835
|
15,907
|
7,321
|
So it looks, statistically that as the population dropped 74,470, and the index shrank by 39.46%, violent acts dropped 17%, Property damages dropped by 41%, Murders where down to 0.5% and rapes were 0.54%. Basically everything is down correct.
Let us look at it another way. For the city of DC, 2006 saw crime as 5.88% overall rate, of which, 25.68% was violent and 79.21% was Property damage. Of the Violent crimes, only 1.93% was murder and 2.11%. Now in the first and upper diagnosis I left out these because they perplex me as to why the seperate catgories.
Robbery and Aggrevated Assaults are listed as sub-catagories of Violent crimes. It must be that during your robbery you where not raped, murdered or had the crap beat out of you and while being assaulted you where not raped, robbed or murdered. Just felt like you had been, and be ever so thankful this did not happen while you where at home because you'd now be in a new category.
So robberies were 11.21% of all indexes, and assaults were 13.43%. But now since I believe that all roberies and assaults especially are violent crimes, I get robberies at 43.65% and assaults are now 52.31%. The last two catagories are car thefts and petty theft. So what else is there, well what about burglary. Apparently only the victim believes haveing your home burgaled is a violent crime. Apparently, most judicial, prosecutural, advocates and arresting officers see it, as a victimless crime. What was taken, oh your personal valueable belongings, just things you can replace.
Just things, like was Uncle Harry's gold pocket watch from 1898, that had an inscription and still worked like new, just a thing to you. How about the Diamond ring that you scrimpt for months to save for, to give your wife or mother on a special occasion. This is just stuff also.
Maybe the really tragedy is the loss of your self seteem, your feeling of safety from harm, the fear that it happened once it can happen again. Do you feel vulnerable or safe in your home? Scared? Angry? All of them and more. Who do you look to protect you now, not the police. They are sorry but they have bigger crimes to solve, like crack, drugs and murders.
All financed by your stolen items of no, or little worth to them, but to you everything.
Repeeling handgun ownership and rifle ownership has done nothing to stop violent crimes, nor have they increased it. Stataticians, who manipulate the figures, Catigorize events to make or break the formula and then puplish their findings only to incite termoil and fear are the culprits to crime.
If laws where passed in favor of the average citizen instead of against them, crime would drop. violent life taking crimes might rise momentarily, but in the long run wil drop to less that 1/10th of 1% of all crimes. Because criminals will be persecuted and detained in accordance with the law and not get that free pass from justice they currently get.
Lets break some of the numbers down better, so back in 1979, when they must of said handgun ownership aided in the crime statistics and a law was needed to out law there easy use and access to. Plus yes registration of them. The main crime index for DC was 56,430 reported crimes, Now to see why homeowners where singled out, lets work with the stats for them only, so all others are the only `violent crimes' covered by the hype.
In 1979, of the 56,430 indexed crimes in DC, Only 10,553 were classified as violent. Which when subtracted from the total, would now give us a total index of 45,877. But wait a moment I think I see a problem here, if Larceny theft and burglaries are not violent crimes as reported, their individual totals exceed the combined total for violent crimes, then they must be non-violent crimes. So that would give us 42,271, leaving 3, 606, or the number of Auto Thefts.
And all others are violent crimes, right. In the number of car thefts, would car jacking be considered a non violent offense, when a child is abducted in the vehicle. Or the Owner of the vehicle being stolen was beaten near to death for it. What of the spouse, if he/she was involved. How can anyone generallize that sort of trearment as non violent.
But back to what I saw as an error in the report. Burglary and robbery, as defined by the Webster dictionary are as follows, Burglary= Noun, 1. Entering a building unlawfully with intent to commit a felony or to steal valuable property.: is a crime; related to theft. a felony, involves trespassing, or entering a building with intent to commit any crime, not necessarily a felony or theft. Burglary laws in some jurisdictions also encompass certain types of shoplifting. Robbery=Noun, 1. Larceny by threat of violence. 2. Plundering during riots or in wartime. Robbery is the crime of seizing property through violence or intimidation. This is different from embezzlement, larceny, and theft. Piracy is a type of robbery. Armed robbery involves the use of a weapon. Highway robbery takes place outside and in a public place. Robbery is generally an urban crime. Carjacking is the act of robbing a car from a victim, usually at gunpoint. If these two words mean virtually the same thing, by what means did they authenticate the validity of their data in this index. None, as I can see.
Now look at Larceny theft, and once again defined by Websters, Larceny= Noun, 1. The act of taking something from someone unlawfully; Larceny is a crime. Under English common law, larceny consisted of (1) a taking (2) and carrying away (3) of tangible personal property (4) of another (5) by trespass (6) with intent to permanently deprive. Larceny by Trick occurs when the victim of larceny is tricked by a misrepresentation of fact into giving up possession of property. This should not be confused with false pretenses, where the victim is tricked into giving up title to the property. Grand larceny is typically defined as larceny of a significant amount of property, in the US this is often defined as an amount valued at $200.00 or more. Auto theft is also included here.
By 2006 not one thing had changed, do the math and see for yourself. If anything it got worse and the Black city leaders want you to believe it is all because of handguns being owned by responsible citizens and not crooks. How stupid does that make you feel mister and misses Washingtonian. A bit miss used and abused. And by whom, those that lied to you and tell you white society wants you dead. We do not.
So if your confused, do not be allarmed, because everyone else is also. Those criminal minded anti-gun lobbeyists, use terror and miss leading numbers to offend the intellect of the average citizen. Who was the only benefactor of the no gun in the home law. Crooks.
They have been given free reign in committing robbery, theft, vandalism, murders, rapes, terrorizing and mayhem in all catagories of crime. It is time to end the cherrade this moment. Send those that commit the most crime back into the pits of hell from which they spawned.
During the entire Mafia heyday of the twenties and thirties, not one law was ever enacted to ban the right to own a gun. In the Forties and early fifties the same. It was not untill we granted unconditionally the rights of free men on a ethnic society that still harbours tribal life over civilized life, that we began to see the requests and demands for gun control.
Black leaders would like for us to think, every black man or person of colour is honest and educated. What a ton of hogwash that is. We peoples of colour know full well that there are eliments within our society and make up, that are of a violent nature and need to be restrained if not removed from this planets face.
The most terrible thing about it is, they where able to convince their own kind that this was needed. All the while they murdered, raped and distroyed there families lives hopes and dreams. Being a criminal is not just a Black issue or a white issue or an Italian, Chinese or Japanese. It is a world problem, and how do we make the world safer for us. By retaking the laws back into our hands, ridding our society of these crooks and making Gun Ownership less of an issue than is your yard as neatly trimmed as your neighbors.